Cart

Rebels & Rights

The Dispatch

Dispatches from the movement. Stories, strategy, and the occasional screed.

15 dispatches & counting

All Dispatches

Page 2 of 2
Protester holding Protect Women's Rights sign
The Dispatch 4 min read

The New Abortion Landscape: What Changed, What's Left to Fight

Three years after Dobbs, here's where things actually stand — and what's coming next. What Dobbs Did On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, ending the constitutional right to abortion that had existed for 49 years. The decision returned the question of abortion access entirely to individual states. Within weeks, trigger laws in 13 states went into effect, banning abortion immediately or near-immediately. Several others followed with new restrictions. The United States went from a country with a constitutional right to abortion to one where access depends entirely on your zip code — and in many places, your ability to travel to a different zip code. The Map as of 2026 The current landscape is roughly: Total or near-total bans: Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. In these states, abortion is either completely illegal or permitted only in extremely narrow circumstances — typically when the pregnant person's life is in immediate danger, with no exception for rape, incest, or fetal anomaly in most of them. Significant restrictions (gestational limits of 6-15 weeks): Florida (6 weeks), Georgia (6 weeks), Iowa (6 weeks), Montana (limited), Nebraska (12 weeks), North Carolina (12 weeks), Ohio (6 weeks), South Carolina (6 weeks), Utah (18 weeks). Protected or expanded access: The remaining states, including California, New York, Illinois, Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, and others, have either constitutional protections for abortion rights or strong statutory protections. Several states have expanded access since Dobbs, seeing themselves as destinations for people traveling from ban states. What This Means in Practice For people living in ban states who become pregnant and don't want to be, the choices are: continue the pregnancy, attempt to self-manage a medication abortion (which remains legally and practically complicated in ban states), or travel. Travel costs money. Travel requires time off work. Travel may not be possible for people with caregiving responsibilities, immigration status concerns, or disabilities. The result is a two-tiered system where abortion access correlates with wealth, mobility, and proximity to state borders. Poor people in rural Texas face a completely different reality than people with the means and ability to travel to New Mexico. Abortion funds are filling gaps where they can — covering travel costs, lodging, childcare. But the scale of need has outpaced even significantly expanded capacity. What's Being Fought in Courts Right Now The legal battles since Dobbs have been numerous and fast-moving. A few of the most significant: Medication abortion. Mifepristone and misoprostol, the medications used in medication abortions (which now account for more than half of all abortions in the U.S.), have been the subject of multiple federal lawsuits. Anti-abortion groups have tried to revoke the FDA's approval of mifepristone, which would effectively eliminate medication abortion nationally. Courts have thus far not done so, but the litigation continues. Emergency exceptions. Federal law (EMTALA) requires hospitals to provide stabilizing treatment, which many legal experts argue includes emergency abortion care. The Biden administration argued this preempts state abortion bans; that case is ongoing under the current administration. State constitutional challenges. In multiple states, advocates have challenged abortion bans under state constitutions. Some of these challenges have succeeded — courts in states including Kansas, Montana, and Kentucky have found state constitutional protections for abortion rights. Ballot initiatives. Voters in multiple states have passed ballot measures protecting or restricting abortion rights since Dobbs. The results have generally been more favorable to abortion access than state legislatures — even in conservative states, voters have rejected the most extreme restrictions. What Comes Next Several things will determine the trajectory over the next several years: Federal legislation remains the only way to establish national standards for abortion access. That requires majorities in both chambers of Congress willing to pass it — which is a political project, not just a legal one. Ballot initiatives will continue to be one of the most direct ways to establish state-level protections. Organizing around ballot measures has become a major focus of reproductive rights groups in states where initiative processes are available. The abortion fund infrastructure built since Dobbs needs sustained funding. Travel assistance, lodging, childcare support, medication access — these practical supports are saving people from forced births right now, and they run on donations. And the long game: changing who holds power in states that have enacted the most extreme restrictions. That's a decade-long organizing project — voter registration, candidate recruitment, electoral organizing — not a single cycle. How to Help The most direct way to help someone who needs an abortion right now is to support abortion funds. The National Network of Abortion Funds (abortionfunds.org) connects you to funds in specific states. The Brigid Alliance provides lodging for people traveling for later abortions. Plan C (plancpills.org) provides information about medication abortion access. For the longer fight: support litigation organizations like the Center for Reproductive Rights and the ACLU, engage in electoral politics at every level, and keep talking about it — normalizing the conversation is part of the work.

Read
Protesters holding signs at a demonstration
The Dispatch 3 min read

What 'No Kings' Actually Means: A Short History of Anti-Authoritarian Resistance

The phrase shows up on protest signs and t-shirts. Here's the history it's invoking — and why it still matters. Before Democracy For most of human history, the default political arrangement was monarchy: one person, by birth or conquest, had absolute power over everyone else. The idea that this was unacceptable — that ordinary people had a right to govern themselves, that rulers derived their authority from the consent of the governed — is historically recent and still far from universal. Anti-authoritarian thought didn't begin with the American Revolution. You can find strains of it in ancient Athens, in the peasant revolts of medieval Europe, in the religious dissent movements that preceded the Reformation. But the Enlightenment — the intellectual revolution of the 17th and 18th centuries — is where the modern language of democratic rights took shape. The American Founding as Anti-Authoritarian Act Whatever its profound contradictions — and they were profound, enslaved people excluded from the rights being proclaimed, Indigenous nations erased from the founding narrative — the American Revolution was, at its core, an act of resistance to inherited authority. The Declaration of Independence is a remarkably radical document for its time: the explicit assertion that governments derive "their just powers from the consent of the governed," that when a government becomes destructive of the rights it exists to protect, "it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it." Thomas Paine's Common Sense, published in 1776, was even more direct. Paine argued that monarchy was not only a bad system but an absurd one — that the idea of one person having hereditary dominion over everyone else was a relic of barbarism that reason and common sense should have long since rejected. It was the most widely read pamphlet in American colonial history. "No kings" — that phrase — shows up in various forms throughout this period as the simplest possible articulation of the underlying principle: that no one person should have unchecked power over others. The History Since American democracy has spent most of its history fighting over whether that founding principle would actually apply to everyone. The abolitionist movement was fundamentally anti-authoritarian — asserting the humanity and freedom of people being held in bondage by the authority of slaveholders and the state. The labor movement was anti-authoritarian — challenging the unchecked power of industrial capitalists over workers' lives. The civil rights movement was anti-authoritarian — challenging the systematic use of state power to deny Black Americans their constitutional rights. Each of these movements invoked founding principles to challenge their betrayal. Each was called radical, dangerous, disruptive. Each was, by most historical accounts, right. Why It's Back Now "No Kings" as a protest phrase has reemerged in a moment when the architecture of democratic accountability — the norms, institutions, and laws that constrain executive power — is under significant strain. When politicians claim authority not derived from democratic legitimacy, when the rule of law is applied selectively, when checks and balances are treated as obstacles rather than essential features of governance, the old language becomes newly relevant. The phrase isn't about any single person or party. It's about the principle: that power in a democracy flows from the people, is accountable to the people, and is legitimately constrained by law and democratic process. When that principle is threatened, the appropriate response has always been — historically — to name the threat and resist it. The Tradition You're Standing In When you wear a "No Kings" shirt, you're placing yourself in a tradition that runs from Thomas Paine to Frederick Douglass to Susan B. Anthony to John Lewis. A tradition that has always been called extreme in its moment and vindicated by history. A tradition of saying, clearly and publicly, that unchecked power is unacceptable regardless of who holds it. That's a tradition worth wearing.

Read
Marchers at the 1963 Civil Rights march on Washington
The Dispatch 4 min read

The History of Dissent: From Suffragettes to Standing Rock

Every generation inherits the movements of the last one. Here's the line that runs from 19th century suffrage to today's frontline fights. Why History Matters for Organizers Social movements often behave as if they invented themselves. They develop their tactics, language, and theories of change in relative isolation from the movements that preceded them, sometimes rediscovering what earlier generations already knew, sometimes avoiding the mistakes that earlier generations made by not knowing they made them. Understanding the history of dissent isn't just useful for trivia. It's useful for strategy. The tactics that worked — and the ones that didn't — can tell you something about what you're up against and what you can do about it. The Suffrage Movement: Fifty Years of Everything The women's suffrage movement in the United States is one of the most instructive case studies in sustained political organizing ever documented. It ran from the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848 to the ratification of the 19th Amendment in 1920 — 72 years. Nearly everyone who started the movement died before it ended. The women who finally celebrated the amendment's passage were the daughters and granddaughters of the founders. What sustained it? Institutional structure. The movement built organizations — the National Woman Suffrage Association, the American Woman Suffrage Association, eventually NAWSA — that persisted through leadership transitions, strategic disagreements, and decades of failure. Individual charisma mattered (Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Sojourner Truth, Ida B. Wells), but what made the movement durable was the infrastructure around those individuals. The movement also demonstrates the importance of tactical diversity. For decades, suffragists pursued purely electoral and legal strategies — trying to win state-by-state, lobbying Congress, pursuing constitutional amendments. In the 1910s, a new generation influenced by British suffragettes introduced more confrontational tactics: demonstrations, picketing the White House, hunger strikes. The tension between these factions was real and sometimes bitter. Looking back, it seems clear that both were necessary. The Labor Movement: Power through Organization The American labor movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries built power through a simple insight: individual workers have almost no leverage, but organized workers do. The eight-hour workday, the weekend, workplace safety regulations, the minimum wage — these are not gifts from benevolent employers or enlightened legislators. They are the products of decades of organizing, strikes, and sustained political pressure. The tactics were sometimes radical and sometimes moderate, sometimes legal and sometimes not. The Pullman Strike of 1894. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire of 1911, which turned public opinion dramatically toward workplace safety regulation. The sit-down strikes of the 1930s, which produced the National Labor Relations Act and the legal framework for modern collective bargaining. What made it work: broad coalitions, strategic use of disruption, legislative and electoral engagement, and an economic analysis that made clear who benefited from the status quo. The Civil Rights Movement: Theory and Practice of Nonviolence The mid-20th century civil rights movement is probably the most studied movement in American history, and for good reason: its strategic sophistication produced extraordinary results in a compressed period under conditions of enormous danger. The movement's theory of change was explicit: nonviolent direct action would expose the violence of the system being protested, creating crises that forced political response. Bull Connor's fire hoses and police dogs in Birmingham were not a failure of the movement — they were, horribly, the point. Forcing the violence of segregation into public view made it politically untenable in a way that decades of legal challenges had not. This doesn't mean the movement was unified or simple. There were deep disagreements about pace, tactics, and goals — between integrationists and Black nationalists, between those who prioritized legislation and those who prioritized economic power, between SCLC and SNCC and CORE. The movement that produced the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act was a coalition held together with enormous effort and constant negotiation. Standing Rock: The Indigenous-Led Environmental Justice Moment The 2016 Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline represents a different kind of movement — Indigenous-led, explicitly spiritual as well as political, international in its coalition while rooted in a specific place and a specific people's relationship to that place. Standing Rock drew on Indigenous traditions of land protection and treaty rights while building unprecedented alliances with veterans' groups, environmental organizations, and solidarity movements from around the world. It introduced the water protector framing — not protesting pipeline construction but actively protecting water and land — which has been influential in subsequent Indigenous-led environmental justice organizing. The pipeline was eventually built. By the narrow measure of immediate outcome, Standing Rock lost. By the broader measure of movement building, coalition development, and long-term political impact — particularly on Indigenous sovereignty issues and pipeline politics — the story is more complicated and ongoing. What These Movements Have in Common Looking across this history, a few themes emerge: Movements take longer than anyone wants. The ones that succeed are the ones that build infrastructure capable of outlasting individual leaders and cycles of energy. Tactical diversity is a feature, not a bug. Movements that combine confrontational and institutional tactics tend to outperform those that commit to only one. Broad coalitions are essential and hard. Every successful movement has had to build alliances across difference — across race, class, geography, strategy. This is the hardest work and the most important. And: the movement you're in right now is part of a line that runs through all of this. You are not starting from scratch. The people who came before you built the ground you're standing on. Build more of it for the people who come after.

Read
People joining hands in solidarity
The Dispatch 3 min read

10 Organizations Worth Supporting Right Now

Where to put your money and time if you want it to actually do something. A practical guide from people who have done the research. We give ten percent of every Rebels & Rights order to organizations doing the hard work. Here are the ones we're watching, funding, and recommending — and why. Reproductive Rights National Network of Abortion Funds NNAF doesn't do policy or advocacy — it gives money to people who need abortions and can't afford them or can't travel to get them. Since Dobbs, the need has increased dramatically while state-level restrictions have made access harder. Practical, direct, immediate impact. This is where donation dollars go furthest. Center for Reproductive Rights The legal organization doing the hardest courtroom work to defend and expand reproductive rights at the federal and state level. The lawyers who argue these cases and the researchers who build the evidentiary record. Not glamorous work; essential work. Voting Rights & Democracy Fair Fight Action Founded by Stacey Abrams after the 2018 Georgia governor's race, Fair Fight works on voter registration, voter protection, and voting rights litigation. Their work in Georgia — which flipped two Senate seats and the 2020 presidential election — is the case study for what sustained investment in voter registration and protection actually produces. ACLU Voting Rights Project The ACLU litigates voting rights cases in every state where voting access is being restricted. If you want to support legal defense of the right to vote, this is one of the most efficient places to put money — their lawyers are winning cases. Trans Rights & LGBTQ+ Justice Transgender Law Center The largest national trans-led legal organization in the U.S. Does impact litigation, policy advocacy, and direct legal services for trans people facing discrimination. The legal landscape for trans people has gotten dramatically more hostile; TLC is one of the primary organizations fighting back in courts and legislatures. The Trevor Project Crisis intervention and suicide prevention for LGBTQ+ young people. In a moment when anti-trans legislation and social hostility are driving mental health crises in queer youth, Trevor's crisis line and text line are literally saving lives. One of the clearest cases in the nonprofit sector for direct, measurable impact. Climate & Environmental Justice Environmental and Climate Justice program (NAACP) The NAACP's environmental justice work focuses on the communities most impacted by pollution and climate change — predominantly Black communities near industrial facilities, in flood zones, and in heat islands. Connects civil rights infrastructure to environmental justice organizing. Earthjustice The legal arm of the environmental movement. They litigate on behalf of communities facing pollution and corporate environmental destruction — for free. Their tagline is "Because the Earth needs a good lawyer," and honestly, it's accurate. Their wins in federal courts have prevented enormous amounts of environmental harm. Immigration Justice RAICES The Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services provides free and low-cost immigration legal services in Texas — which, given current federal enforcement priorities, puts them at the center of the crisis. They also do policy advocacy and family reunification work. A direct-service organization doing urgent work. Mental Health & Community Care NAMI (National Alliance on Mental Illness) America's largest grassroots mental health organization, with affiliates in every state. Peer-to-peer support groups, family education programs, and advocacy for mental health policy and funding. In a moment of widespread mental health crisis, NAMI's community infrastructure is some of the most important work happening in this space. How to Give Effectively A few principles worth considering: Recurring donations beat one-time giving. Organizations can plan around recurring revenue. Even $10/month is more valuable than a $200 one-time gift because it's predictable. Unrestricted donations are the most useful. When you give to a specific campaign or program, you're constraining how the organization can use the money. Unrestricted general operating support lets them put money where it's needed most. Volunteer time compounds donation impact. If you have skills — legal, medical, technological, organizational — most of these organizations can use them. Skilled volunteers do things money can't buy. Local organizations are often under-resourced. The national orgs get most of the donations. Your local abortion fund, your county's legal aid organization, your city's mutual aid network — they're often doing as much work with far less money. Don't underestimate local giving.

Read
Crowd of protesters with signs at a rally
The Dispatch 3 min read

Why Graphic Tees Are a Form of Political Speech

The long, strange history of clothing as protest — from the suffragettes to today. The Body as Billboard Before there was Instagram, before there was cable news, before there was the printing press, humans used their bodies and their clothing to communicate. Tribal markings, mourning dress, religious habit, military uniform — clothing has always been a language. The question isn't whether your clothing communicates. It's what it says, and to whom, and why. Political clothing in the modern sense — clothing designed to make a specific, legible statement about power and justice — has a history at least as old as the organized labor movement. Union members wore pins and ribbons. Abolitionists wore anti-slavery medallions. The tradition of using what you wear as a form of speech is older than most of the rights we're currently fighting to protect. The Suffragettes and the Politics of White One of the most sophisticated uses of clothing as political speech in American history was the suffragette movement's adoption of the color white. White dresses weren't an accident or a fashion choice — they were a deliberate visual strategy. The suffragettes were attacking a specific charge: that women who wanted the vote were unfeminine, radical, dangerous. White dresses communicated femininity, respectability, purity — all the things that the anti-suffrage movement said suffragettes weren't. It was rhetorical judo, using the visual language of conventional femininity to undermine the argument that women who wanted rights were somehow monstrous. When Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and dozens of other Democratic congresswomen wore white to Trump's 2019 State of the Union address, they were invoking that exact tradition, deliberately and effectively. The New York Times ran a full piece explaining the symbolism. That's what good visual communication does: it makes people ask questions. Protest T-Shirts: A Short History The graphic t-shirt as political medium emerged in the 1960s and hasn't stopped evolving since. Early political tees were often homemade — iron-on letters, screen printing in someone's garage. The technology limited the sophistication of the message but not its effectiveness. Some political t-shirts have become iconic cultural artifacts. The "I Am a Man" shirts worn by sanitation workers during the 1968 Memphis strike were simple and devastating — a direct rebuttal to the dehumanizing conditions they were protesting. The "This Is What a Feminist Looks Like" shirt, popularized in the early 2000s, did exactly what good protest fashion does: challenged an assumption by making the challenger visible. The "I Can't Breathe" shirts worn after Eric Garner's death in 2014 spread from protest marches to NBA arenas to high school gymnasiums within weeks. When LeBron James wore one during warmups, it was the front page of every newspaper in the country. That's the reach that protest fashion has now — not despite its simplicity, but because of it. What Makes a Good Political Shirt Not all political clothing is equally effective. The best activist apparel does a few things: It starts a conversation. The goal isn't to preach to people who already agree — it's to make people who don't agree yet ask a question. "What does that mean?" "Why does that matter?" That's the entry point. It's specific enough to mean something but broad enough to be personal. "Women's Rights Are Human Rights" works because it's specific about what's at stake but legible to a huge range of people. Overly insider language plays well at the march but confuses everyone else. It belongs to the person wearing it. The most effective political fashion connects to genuine belief. Wearing a shirt about a cause you don't actually care about reads as hollow. Wearing one about something that genuinely matters to you — that anger or commitment shows, somehow, even through fabric. It looks good. This isn't trivial. Good design signals that the movement takes itself seriously. It commands a second look. It makes people think the cause might be worth taking seriously too. The Limits, Too Wearing the shirt is not the same as doing the work. Fashion activism can become a substitute for organizing rather than a complement to it — a way to feel like you're doing something without actually doing anything. The shirt matters when it starts conversations that turn into donations, phone calls, volunteer hours, and votes. When it's part of a broader practice of engagement, it does real work. When it's the only thing, it's cosplay. We started Rebels & Rights because we believe in both: the political power of making your values visible, and the necessity of backing up what you wear with what you do. The shirt matters. So does everything else.

Read
Black Lives Matter protest march, London 2020
The Dispatch 4 min read

How to Prepare for Your First Protest: A Complete Guide

Everything you need to know before you show up — from what to wear to what to do if things go sideways. First: You Belong There If you've never been to a protest and you're nervous about going, that's normal. The most common thing people say after their first march is some version of: "I wish I'd done this sooner." Protests are, mostly, just large groups of people walking and chanting together. They feel less intimidating in person than they look on the news, in part because the news tends to focus on conflict over the overwhelming majority of marches that are peaceful, boring, and meaningful. You don't need to be an expert activist. You don't need to have the most radical politics in the room. You just need to show up. Do Your Research Before you go, know the basics: Who's organizing it? Is this a march organized by a major coalition (Planned Parenthood, the NAACP, Indivisible), a local grassroots group, or something more informal? This affects logistics, likely crowd size, and political context. What's the route? Organizers usually publish a route or at least a start and end point. Know where you're going and how long it's expected to take. What are the goals? What is this march asking for? What change is it demanding? You don't have to agree with every position of every organizer, but you should understand what you're participating in. What are the local laws? In most U.S. cities, peaceful marching on sidewalks or in permitted street closures is fully legal. Some cities require permits; most permitted marches have them. Unpermitted marches carry more risk. Know what you're walking into. What to Wear and Bring Wear layers. Weather changes. So does how you feel after four hours of walking. Comfortable shoes. This is the single most important clothing choice. Protests often involve more standing and walking than you expect. Blisters are the enemy of solidarity. Goggles or glasses if you have them, in case of crowd control spray. Not required, but useful. Cash, not just a card. If you need to pay for water or food or transit, cash works when card readers don't. Your ID — though you may not need it, it's wise to have it. A fully charged phone and a portable battery if you have one. Write down (on paper, in pen, on your arm) the phone number of a lawyer or legal observer hotline for your city. In the event your phone is taken or dead, you'll need a number you can call from someone else's phone. Water and a snack. March organizers don't usually have food. Take care of your body. Your R&R shirt, obviously. If You're Going With People Establish a meeting point before you start marching — somewhere specific, not "near the fountain." Decide how you'll communicate if you get separated. Make sure everyone knows the phone number of the legal observer line. If someone in your group is a minor, or has a medical condition that could be affected by heat, crowding, or exertion, have a plan for that. Know Your Rights In the United States, you have the right to protest in public spaces. Police cannot arrest you simply for being present at a protest. You cannot be arrested for refusing to give your name in most states (though in some states, if you're detained, you are required to identify yourself — know your state's rules). If you're arrested or detained: Stay calm. Compliance with arrest is not admission of guilt. Say clearly: "I am invoking my right to remain silent" and "I want a lawyer." Do not answer questions until you have spoken with a lawyer. You can be held for up to 48 hours without being charged in most jurisdictions. The ACLU has know-your-rights resources specific to your state at aclu.org. What to Do If Things Get Tense The vast majority of protests are peaceful. But if the situation escalates: Don't escalate. If someone is trying to provoke conflict, don't engage. Walk away. Move to the edges. If a crowd gets compressed or panics, the middle is the most dangerous place. Move toward the sides and exits. Stay with someone. Don't get separated from your group in a chaotic situation. Know where the exits are. Before the march starts, orient yourself: where are the cross streets, the subway entrances, the open spaces? After the March Protests feel good. Then you go home and the world is still the same and you feel let down. That's normal. Single events rarely change things directly — they're part of a longer arc. What matters is what you do next. Connect with the organizations that organized the march. Sign up for their list. Come to their next event. Bring a friend who didn't come this time. Make a recurring donation if you can afford it. Call your representatives. Vote. The march is the beginning, not the finish line.

Read